Skip to content

Overview: Permanence and Responsibility

The fixer comes off and the negative looks finished. It is not. Two things are still in the gelatin and one of them is invisible: the thiosulfate the bath left behind, and whatever silver the bath dissolved and did not carry away. Neither does anything today. Both are the reason a print made in 1885 can be a clean purple-brown and the print beside it, from the same studio in the same month, a yellow ghost.

What has to leave, and how fast can it. Washing is diffusion outward and nothing else, so it obeys the arithmetic of gradients rather than the arithmetic of time. That is why n changes of water beat a trickle of the same total volume by orders of magnitude, why a fibre-base print takes an hour where a resin-coated one takes thirty seconds, and why a hypo clearing agent shortens the job by exchanging one ion for another rather than by dissolving anything.

What happens if it does not leave. Retained thiosulfate supplies sulfur to the image silver; retained silver complexes supply silver to the whites; and the air supplies oxidants to both. The three failures look different — a general yellow, a stained highlight, a blue metallic sheen at the edges — and they have different causes, which means a print can tell you which mistake was made.

How you prove it. Not by looking at the print. By two spot tests on materials carried through the same session, read against controls, which is the lab in the middle of this part.

Where the silver goes. A working darkroom’s fixer is the most concentrated silver stream most people will ever handle, and the second half of this part is about recovering it and about the rules that govern the rest of the waste.

Two tests, both published, both at drop scale.

Residual thiosulfate, by the test Kodak Limited printed in 1949: process an unexposed white sheet of the same paper alongside the batch, cut a strip after the final wash, immerse it for about three minutes in a 1 per cent silver nitrate solution, rinse it, and compare it wet against the wet, untreated part of the same sheet. No colour difference means the hypo has gone; a yellow-brown tint means it has not.

Residual silver, by the test ILFORD publishes for its rapid fixer: 2 g of sodium sulfide in 125 mL of water, diluted 1+9 for use, one drop on a white area of a washed print, blotted, and read against a reference spot placed on a print known to be well fixed. A barely visible cream tint is the reference; anything yellower is a print that was not properly fixed.

Both answer a question the bath-side instruments cannot. Kodak is blunt that silver estimator strips work above about 1 g/L and that on-site techniques “cannot typically be used to demonstrate regulatory compliance”. A test that reads the fixer tells you about the fixer; only a test on the material tells you about the material.

From Part III, diffusion and osmosis, which owns Fick’s law, the halving law and the swollen gel this part applies without re-deriving, and complex formation, which numbers the stepwise thiosulfate complexes.

From Part XI, how fixer works and fixer capacity, exhaustion and residual silver. The second of those is the page this part continues: it named the two failures, stated the course’s own fixing criterion, and said plainly that the residual-silver test was a Part XII lab because it needs reagents Part XI deliberately did without.

From Part II, chemical waste and silver waste, which set up the containers, and laboratory safety and PPE.

It does not tone. Protective toning is named here as the intervention that changes image silver into a less reactive compound, and Kodak’s own toner publication is quoted for the claim, but the chemistry, the choices and the practice belong to Part XX. It does not print the international standards on image stability, because the course does not hold them; it names them by number, states its own criterion in public where you can check it, and labels every figure it derives as its own. And it does not refine silver: recovery here stops at a sludge in a jar and a container with a label on it.

Part12 of 28Level2 — PractitionerPages6Estimated time11.0 hoursHighest safety levelLevel B

2 of 6 pages in this part need a darkroom, a UV source or mains-powered equipment, marked below. Each says what can be improvised and, where one exists, gives an alternative route.

0 / 6 lessons in this part completed

Sources for this page

5 cited · checked 2026-09-05

  1. 01Washing Photographic Film and Papers: instructions for minimum water usageHARMAN technology Limited (ILFORD Photo), 2015§ Purpose of washing — washing removes residual chemicals from the photographic process, in particular thiosulphate from the fix process, which can cause long-term image degradation if not effectively removed; Films, the spiral-tank method of fill and invert five times, ten times and twenty times; FB Papers, the optimum permanence sequenceilfordphoto.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Reducing-Wash-Water.pdftier 1, primary2026-09-05
  2. 02ILFORD RAPID FIXER, technical informationHARMAN technology Limited (ILFORD Photo), 2010§ Silver concentration — the sodium sulphide test for prints, 2 g in 125 ml diluted 1+9 for use, read against a reference spot placed on a print known to be well fixed and thoroughly washed, with the note that silver estimator papers are usually not sensitive enough to test the very low silver levels suitable for optimum permanenceilfordphoto.com/amfile/file/download/file/1833/product/711tier 1, primary2026-09-05
  3. 03Chemicals and Formulae, 3rd edition (one of a series of Kodak photographic handbooks)Kodak Limited, 1949§ Hypo Eliminator and Test Solutions — TEST FOR HYPO, the unexposed white sheet processed with the batch, a strip of it immersed for about three minutes in a 1 per cent silver nitrate solution, rinsed and compared while wet in subdued light with the wet untreated portion, no colour difference meaning the hypo has gone and a yellow-brown tint meaning it has not, with the caution that silver nitrate solution stains the skin black; Kodak formula HT-1a, hypo test solution for checking thoroughness of washingarchive.org/details/KodakChemicalsAndFormulaetier 1, primary2026-09-05
  4. 04Photo Storage, Display, & Labeling Materials: A Guide to ISO 18902 'Photo-Safe' TestingImage Permanence Institute§ The reactant and damage table, which pairs oxidising agents, reducing agents, acids, high alkali, lignin, chromophores and unstable colorants with image fade, silver mirroring, gold or red spots, yellowing, weakening and colorant stain; the Photographic Activity Test as ISO 18916rit.edu/ipi/sites/rit.edu.ipi/files/documents/photo_safe_english.pdftier 1, primary2026-09-05
  5. 05Measuring Silver in Photographic Processing Facilities, publication J-211Eastman Kodak Company§ On-Site Techniques — silver estimating test paper usable above about 1 gram per litre, and the statement that on-site techniques are qualitative and cannot typically be used to demonstrate regulatory compliance125px.com/docs/unsorted/kodak/J211.pdftier 1, primary2026-09-05

Formulas, hazard statements, historical dates and process descriptions on this page were checked against the sources above on the date shown. Safety data changes: obtain the current safety data sheet for the product you actually buy before you open it.